As we approach the busiest season of the year, fireworks retailers and display companies can expect an inspection from one, if not several, law enforcement and regulatory agencies. We all know that these inspections are deliberately timed to occur now due to the increased level of activity; as a result, these agencies reap a windfall in terms of the fines and penalties assessed.
Since an inspection can occur on any given day, it is recommended that your business designate one employee to oversee the process in advance. This procedure will assist you in keeping the facts, and events, straight and, at the same time, avoid the confusion and inconsistency that arises when several individuals are involved in the inspection process. The need to have one version, and only one version, of the facts and events is paramount, as government prosecutors are looking to exploit any inconsistency.
Your reception desk should be instructed to promptly announce the arrival of any government inspector to senior management which, in turn, will assign an employee to participate in the inspection. That employee should introduce himself to the government inspector(s) and explain that he has been designated by the business to participate in the inspection process. Oftentimes, several inspectors arrive and fan out around the business premises and, in this instance, you should assign an employee to accompany each inspector with the direction that that employee is not authorized to respond for the business but only to view and report. All questions should be directed to the employee designated to oversee the inspection process. Over time, government agents will come to understand that this is a regular company policy and practice; and, notwithstanding an agent’s contention that you are interfering with government business, as a business owner you are entitled to implement reasonable and rational policies and practices.
The designated employee should be thoroughly familiar with the regulations that govern the business (e.g. DOT, ATF, DOL, etc.); if necessary, you may want to designate one employee for each agency to spread the workload. Also, the employee should undertake to perform an informal inspection in an effort to identify and rectify any potential violations in advance of the formal inspection.
The employee assigned to inspection duty should be user-friendly; meaning, he must be able to remain calm in the face of government inspectors who may act imperiously, arbitrarily and capriciously. The inspection process is not the time to argue (you will be provided an opportunity to dispute any violation that may result); rather, it is a time to listen and observe. Over time, your employee will come to understand the peculiarities of the inspector and should be able to anticipate problems and resolve them prior to any formal inspection. Also, over the course of time a comfort level by and between your employee and the inspector may develop.
A written record of the time the inspection began and ended should be made, together with notes describing what was said by the inspector, as well as what was inspected and observed, and for how long. I suggest that each employee involved carry a camera during the inspection to photograph the subject or location of the alleged violation. The photograph should be dated and signed by the photographer for purposes of authenticating it in the event that they will be used at an enforcement proceeding. My experience has been that inspectors are less likely to issue questionable violations when they understand that you will be documenting the alleged violation. In the event the inspector becomes irate with the presence of a camera, have your employee calmly explain that your business has instituted this procedure as a standard operating procedure. Additionally, you may instruct your employee to advise the inspector that, in the spirit of cooperation, you will refrain from taking photographs during the inspection. Make a written record of the inspector’s demand to cease photographing, specifying the date, time, and the substance of the inspector’s objections; and, thereafter, photograph the subject or location of the inspector’s violations outside his presence.
All of the written notes and photographs should be maintained in a separate file bearing the date and identity of the agency for future reference, if necessary. As you know, each inspector seemingly interprets the regulations subject to his authority differently for a variety of reasons. We also know that the issuance of a notice of violation is subject to the sole discretion of the inspector.
In conclusion, it is important that the inspection process be treated with the utmost seriousness. Suffice it to say, a proactive approach to inspections is likely to be the difference between success and failure.
